Modvat credit on dealer invoices allowed where the notification did not require manufacturer authorisation.

Notification No. 15/94-C.E. was construed with Section 2(k) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to determine whether Modvat credit could be denied solely because invoices were issued by dealers not specifically appointed or authorised by the manufacturer. The analysis concluded that the notification does not impose such an authorisation requirement, and invoices issued by a wholesale dealer for goods purchased from the manufacturer's factory or depot may serve as valid documents for Modvat credit. On that basis, denial of credit was not justified.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied merely because the invoices were issued by dealers who were not appointed or authorised by the manufacturer under Notification No. 15/94-C.E. dated 30-3-1994.

Analysis: The definition of wholesale dealer under Section 2(k) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the scope of Notification No. 15/94 were applied. It was held that the notification does not require a dealer to be specifically appointed or authorised by the manufacturer, and invoices issued by a wholesale dealer for goods purchased from the manufacturer's factory or depot can qualify as valid documents for Modvat credit.

Conclusion: The invoices were eligible for Modvat credit and the denial of credit was not justified.

---