Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 57-CC(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was attracted to tobacco refuse generated during manufacture of cigarettes and sold for consideration, so as to require payment of the prescribed amount despite the goods being classifiable under a nil-rate heading.
Analysis: The tobacco refuse arose from inputs on which Modvat credit had been taken, and its removal for sale had to conform to the prescribed mode for waste under Rule 57-F(18). The nil rate attached to the refuse did not entitle the manufacturer to retain the input credit while also marketing the refuse for price. The relevant scheme required adjustment of credit where inputs were used in relation to both dutiable and nil-rate final products, and Rule 57-V did not displace that position on the facts presented.
Conclusion: Rule 57-CC(1) applied, and the amount demanded for clearance of the tobacco refuse was payable; the challenge by the assessee failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A manufacturer taking credit on inputs and also clearing waste or refuse generated from those inputs for sale at nil duty cannot retain the credit and escape the credit-adjustment mechanism where the statutory conditions for waste removal are not followed.