Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for debonding of a 100% Export Oriented Unit, depreciation was to be computed from 29-3-1996 or from 19-7-1996, having regard to the notification and the Board's circular.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the unit's activity from 29-3-1996 was only trial production or amounted to commercial production. The notification provided that depreciation would be admissible from the date commercial production starts, while the Board's circular clarified that depreciation would be counted from the date the capital goods are put into the manufacturing process in the EOU. The unit had entered production in the statutory records and the capital goods were found to have been put into manufacturing process on 29-3-1996. The circular was treated as binding and supportive of the assessee's position, and the Revenue's reliance on quantity produced was not accepted as determinative.
Conclusion: The date relevant for depreciation was held to be 29-3-1996, and not 19-7-1996, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the sole substantive question, with the duty demand and penalty consequence not surviving on the date of depreciation adopted by the authorities.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a Board circular clarifying the relevant notification treats depreciation as running from the date capital goods are put into the manufacturing process, that clarification governs the computation and is binding on the departmental authorities.