Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether steel forgings classified under Chapter 73 and supplied for use in motor vehicle manufacture were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 239/86-C.E. as motor vehicle parts.
Analysis: The relevant notification exempted motor vehicle parts falling under Chapter 73. The goods were rough forgings that had reached a stage of manufacture where, after further machining, they would become motor vehicle parts. The Department's objection that the items were not directly usable as parts was not substantiated. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the Commissioner (Appeals)'s view that the notification covered such goods and that exemption could not be denied merely because further processing was required.
Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 239/86-C.E. was available and the denial of benefit was not justified.
Final Conclusion: The departmental appeal failed and the assessee retained the benefit of exemption for the disputed forgings.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification expressly covers motor vehicle parts falling under a specified tariff chapter, goods that have attained the character of such parts and are classifiable under that chapter cannot be denied the exemption merely because they require further machining before final fitment.