Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Switch Mode Power Supply used in computers was classifiable under Heading 84.71 or under Heading 85.04, and whether reclassification could be made when the goods had been cleared as inputs under Heading 84.71.
Analysis: The record showed that the goods were used exclusively in computers to convert AC current into DC current and that the original authority had found them to be specifically designed for such use. That factual finding was not displaced in the departmental appeal. The Tribunal also applied the Larger Bench ruling that, where the supplier had classified the inputs under Heading 84.71 and duty had been paid accordingly, reclassification to another heading was not warranted in the removal of such inputs. On that basis, Chapter Note 5(b) supported classification under Heading 84.71 rather than Heading 85.04.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 84.71, and the order reclassifying them under Heading 85.04 could not stand.