Court affirms transfer of assessment file under Income-tax Act to Central Circle; emphasizes exclusive jurisdiction of Assessing Officer.

The court upheld the transfer of the assessment file under the Income-tax Act from one officer to another, specifically to the Central Circle. It clarified that the transfer encompassed the entire proceedings under the Act, including assessments. The court emphasized that only one Assessing Officer can have jurisdiction over an assessee at a time, dismissing the petitioner's argument that regular assessments should be retained with the previous officer after transfer of raid cases. The challenge against the transfer order was dismissed as lacking legal merit.

---

---

Issues: Challenge to transfer of assessment file under Income-tax Act from one officer to another officer; Interpretation of "case" under section 127; Retention of regular assessments with previous Assessing Officer after transfer of raid cases to Central Circle.

The judgment involves a challenge to the transfer of an assessment file under the Income-tax Act from one officer to another officer, specifically from the present Assessing Officer to the Central Circle. The petitioner contested the transfer order issued by the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, arguing that the transfer did not entail transfer of jurisdiction in respect of the assessee. The petitioner maintained that only the "case" could be transferred under section 127, not the entire jurisdiction. However, the court referred to the Explanation to section 127, which defines "case" as encompassing the entire proceedings under the Act. The court cited a previous case, Redwood Hotel P. Ltd. v. Chief CIT, to support the interpretation that the transfer of the raid file entailed the transfer of the entire proceedings, including assessments, to the officer designated by the Chief Commissioner.

Furthermore, the petitioner contended that even if raid cases were transferred to the Central Circle, regular assessments should still be retained with the previous Assessing Officer. The court found no provision in the Act allowing two Assessing Officers to retain concurrent jurisdiction over the same assessee. The court emphasized that only one Assessing Officer can have regular jurisdiction over an assessee at any given time, as per the scheme of the Act. Therefore, upon transfer, all files, pending assessments, and future returns are transferred to the designated officer, and the previous Assessing Officer ceases to have jurisdiction. The court dismissed the challenge against the transfer order, stating that the petitioner's argument lacked justification and that the original petition was devoid of merit.

In conclusion, the court upheld the transfer of the assessment file to the Central Circle, emphasizing that the transfer entailed the transfer of the entire proceedings under the Income-tax Act. The judgment clarified that only one Assessing Officer can have jurisdiction over an assessee at a time, and upon transfer, all assessments and future filings are to be handled by the designated officer. The court dismissed the challenge against the transfer order, ruling that the petitioner's contentions were unfounded and lacked legal basis.

---