Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on glass bottles used as packing material was admissible when the cost of the bottles was included in the assessable value of aerated water, despite the absence of an approved price list after 1-4-1994.
Analysis: The relevant exclusion under the Explanation to Rule 57A denies Modvat credit only where the cost of the packing material was not included in the assessable value of the final product in the preceding financial year. The Tribunal found from the available price list that no abatement had been claimed for the bottles as durable and returnable packing, so the allegation of double did not survive. It further held that, after dispensing with approval of price lists from 1-4-1994, the proper evidence of inclusion of cost could be a Chartered Accountant's certificate. On the facts, the certificate showed that the cost of bottles on instalment basis had been included in the cost of aerated water.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the glass bottles was admissible and the demand and penalty could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the cost of packing material is shown to have been included in the assessable value of the final product, Modvat credit is admissible, and in the post-1-4-1994 regime such inclusion may be proved by reliable evidence such as a Chartered Accountant's certificate even without an approved price list.