Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference application under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was maintainable where the underlying dispute concerned eligibility to exemption under Notification No. 167/79 and thus related to the rate of duty for purposes of assessment.
Analysis: The dispute in the appeal was held to concern eligibility to exemption from duty under the notification, which had a direct bearing on the rate of duty applicable for assessment of the goods. A reference application is barred by Section 35G(1) where the order appealed against relates, among other things, to the determination of any question having a relation to the rate of duty of excise or to the value of goods for purposes of assessment.
Conclusion: The reference application was not maintainable and was rejected.