Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether demand of duty under Rule 196 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could be sustained when the assessee's application for an L-6 licence under Rule 192 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 had disclosed carbon black feedstock as one of the final products to be manufactured.
Analysis: The exemption notifications operated subject to compliance with Chapter X procedure, and the assessee had applied for and obtained L-6 licence under Rule 192 after stating carbon black feedstock among the products proposed to be manufactured from raw naphtha. Once the department granted the licence on that footing and allowed the concessional procedure to continue, the raw naphtha could not be treated as not having been used for the purpose and in the manner stated in the application. On that premise, the precondition for invoking Rule 196 was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The demand of duty under Rule 196 was not valid, and the penalty also could not stand.