Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported batteries designed for use in an aircraft were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 11/97-Cus. despite being classified under sub-heading 8506.90 as goods of general use.
Analysis: The goods were shown by the product literature to be specially designed for use in aircraft. The notification extended exemption to parts of aeroplanes and required the Customs authorities to see whether the goods were likely to be used in an aircraft, rather than to deny the benefit merely because the goods could also be treated as items of general use. The ownership of an aircraft by the importer was treated as sufficient to resolve any doubt in favour of the claimed end-use.
Conclusion: The batteries qualified as aircraft parts for the purpose of the notification and the exemption was available to the importer.