Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit of duty paid on kraft paper could be taken when the inputs were sent to a job worker for conversion into cartons used as packing material for the final product, and whether exemption of the intermediate cartons from duty affected such credit.
Analysis: The credit was claimed on inputs sent to a job worker for making cartons which were returned for packing the manufactured yarn. The governing principle applied was that credit on inputs is allowable even when the intermediate product is exempt from duty. Rule 57D permitted such credit, and the exemption status of the cartons did not alter the entitlement. The reasoning followed the earlier view that the cartons were only an intermediate product in the manufacturing chain.
Conclusion: The respondent was entitled to take credit of the duty paid on the kraft paper, and the appeal failed.