Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appeal upholds duty demand for goods used in manufacturing for export with prospective amendments.</h1> <h3>KIRLOSKAR LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & CUS., PUNE</h3> KIRLOSKAR LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & CUS., PUNE - 2001 (127) E.L.T. 805 (Tri. - Mum.) The appeal considered whether Notification 213/86 applies to goods consumed in manufacturing for export units. Amendments in rules and notifications were found to be prospective. Duty demand was deemed valid, but the correct amount needs clarification. The appellant must provide figures to the Commissioner for reevaluation of the duty amount.