Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the penalty; and whether, prima facie, the penalty was justified on the allegation that sales to a related company had been suppressed.
Analysis: The application arose in a valuation dispute where the duty had already been deposited and the penalty was challenged. The appellant had disclosed the proposed transfer arrangement to the department, and the transfer itself was dependent upon statutory approval, including clearance under Section 269C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On these facts, the tribunal found that the department's view of immediate transfer and suppression was not free from doubt at the interim stage, and that the legal position had been treated in an overly simplistic manner for purposes of penalty.
Outcome: Pre-deposit of the penalty was waived and recovery of the penalty was stayed.