Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal in relation to Modvat credit on coolants/lubricating oils and PTFE coated glass cloth under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The applicant relied on decisions supporting admissibility of Modvat credit on consumables and materials used in the manufacturing process. The Revenue opposed the request by contending that an input used only for better operation of machinery falls outside the Modvat scheme. On a close consideration of the submissions and the cited case law, the appellant's reliance on the authorities recognizing similar inputs as eligible was found relevant, and a prima facie case in favour of the appellant was made out.
Conclusion: The condition of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery of the same was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.