MRP valuation under excise law was inapplicable where small pouches were exempt and outer packs were only wholesale packages.

Unit pouches of 5 gms and 9 gms were covered by Rule 34(b) of the Packaged Commodities Rules because they contained less than 20 gms, so MRP declaration was not mandatory. The outer polythene packs were treated as wholesale packages under Rule 2(x) and were not established to be multi-piece packages under Rule 2(j), so their non-marking did not violate the 1977 Rules. On that footing, valuation under section 4A of the Central Excise Act could not be applied on an MRP basis and section 4 valuation remained applicable; the demand and penalties could not be sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the unit pouches of 5 gms and 9 gms and the outer polythene packs were liable to assessment under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the basis of maximum retail price, or whether valuation under section 4 of that Act was applicable because the goods were not required to bear MRP declarations under the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977.

Analysis: The unit pouches contained less than 20 gms and therefore fell within the exemption in Rule 34(b) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977, under which MRP declaration was not required. The outer polythene packs were treated as wholesale packages under Rule 2(x) and were not shown to be multi-piece packages within Rule 2(j). On that basis, the non-marking of MRP on the wholesale packs was not a violation of the 1977 Rules. The certificate obtained from the Controller, Legal Metrology and the Board's circular supported this position, and the Larger Bench decisions relied on treated similar packaging as outside MRP-based valuation.

Conclusion: The goods were not liable to be assessed under section 4A on MRP basis and the valuation under section 4 was not displaced. The demand and penalties could not be sustained.

Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded, and the impugned orders were set aside because the packaging did not attract mandatory MRP declaration under the applicable packaged commodities regime.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the individual retail pouches fall within the exemption from MRP declaration and the outer packing is only a wholesale package, section 4A valuation cannot be applied merely because the goods ultimately reach consumers through retail sale.

---