Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods in question were capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The use of the disputed items was accepted as being connected with the UPS system and with measuring and monitoring machine vibration, and these uses were not disputed in the appeal. In light of the Larger Bench interpretation of the Explanation to Rule 57Q(1), such goods fell within the scope of capital goods. The earlier decisions relied upon by the Revenue were treated as not governing the issue after the Larger Bench ruling.
Conclusion: The goods were held to be capital goods eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q, and the Revenue's appeal failed.