Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether second-hand machinery and an old used pump imported without the requisite licence were liable to confiscation, and whether the redemption fine and penalties imposed on the importer were warranted.
Analysis: The import of second-hand equipment without an import licence was prohibited under the import policy then in force, and the machinery as well as the pump were found to be second-hand or old and used, respectively. Confiscation of both consignments was therefore sustained. The redemption fines were not interfered with, as they were already fixed after considering the relevant factors. However, as there was no finding of mala fides, under-invoicing, or deliberate misdeclaration, and the importer's conduct was treated as bona fide, the penalties imposed were found unnecessary.
Conclusion: Confiscation of both imports and the redemption fines were upheld, but the penalties were set aside.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded only to the limited extent of deletion of penalties, while the confiscation orders and redemption fines remained undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where prohibited second-hand or used goods are imported without the required licence, confiscation may be sustained, but penalty is not justified in the absence of mala fide or deliberate wrongdoing.