Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether electric motor, LT power capacitor, static converter supply transformer and electrical goods qualified as "capital goods" eligible for modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The goods were examined in the light of the Explanation to Rule 57Q(1) of the Central Excise Rules and the interpretation placed on that provision by the Larger Bench in Jawahar Mills Ltd. The reasoning accepted that the goods in question fell within the scope of "capital goods" for the purpose of modvat credit, and the Revenue's objections did not survive against that interpretation.
Conclusion: The goods were held to be eligible capital goods under Rule 57Q, and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appellate authority's view allowing modvat credit on the disputed items was upheld, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used in connection with the manufacturing process and falling within the interpretative scope of the relevant explanation to Rule 57Q are eligible as capital goods for modvat credit where binding Tribunal precedent so holds.