Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods in question were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 155/86 and whether the appeal deserved to be allowed in view of the Tribunal's earlier on the same goods.
Analysis: The dispute concerned the classification and consequent availability of exemption in respect of scientific and cooling apparatus. The Tribunal noted that in the appellants' own case, concerning the same goods, the benefit of Notification No. 155/86 had already been held admissible. As the controversy stood settled by the earlier decision on identical goods, the same view was followed.
Conclusion: The goods were held entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 155/86 and the appeal was allowed.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the exemption issue, and the departmental denial of the notification benefit did not survive.