Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the pending appeal stood withdrawn and the Tribunal was barred from deciding the dispute once the designated authority under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme issued a certificate certifying full and final settlement of the declared tax arrears.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under Section 90(2) contemplates issuance of a certificate on payment of the amount determined by the designated authority. Section 90(4) provides that where an appeal or reference giving rise to tax arrears is pending, it shall be deemed to have been withdrawn on the date of the order passed under sub-section (2). Section 92 further bars the Appellate Authority from proceeding to decide any issue relating to the disputed amount covered by such declaration and order. Since the certificate of settlement was placed before the Tribunal, the statutory consequences followed and the dispute could not be adjudicated further.
Conclusion: The appeal was liable to be treated as withdrawn by operation of the scheme, and the Tribunal could not proceed to decide the merits of the dispute.