Conditional excise exemption for paper and paperboard depends on stated notification requirements and proof by the Revenue.

Notification No. 139/86-C.E. allowed concessional duty on paper and paperboard manufactured from pulp containing at least 50% by weight of pulp made from materials other than bamboo, hardwood, softwood, reeds or rags, and the benefit also depended on the factory having the required attached plant. The note states that the Revenue's later objection relied on a factual basis not set out in the show cause notice and that it failed to prove either use of excluded materials or non-fulfilment of the notification conditions. It therefore records that the exemption was available and the Revenue's challenge did not succeed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the respondents were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 139/86-C.E. for paper and paperboard cleared from their factory.

Analysis: The notification granted concessional duty to paper and paperboard manufactured out of pulp containing not less than 50% by weight of pulp made from materials other than bamboo, hardwood, softwood, reeds or rags, and its benefit was available only where the factory had the requisite attached plant. The adjudicating authority had accepted the respondents' claim, and the Revenue's later objection proceeded on a factual ground different from that alleged in the show cause notice. The Revenue also failed to substantiate its plea that the goods were in fact manufactured from excluded materials or that the notification conditions were not met.

Conclusion: The respondents were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 139/86-C.E., and the Revenue's challenge failed.

Final Conclusion: The classification benefit and concessional duty exemption were upheld in favour of the respondents, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: An exemption under a conditional notification cannot be denied on a factual basis not put in the show cause notice, and the Revenue must substantiate any claim that the statutory conditions for exemption are not satisfied.

---