Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cost of dies separately recovered from customers was includible in the assessable value of printed pouches, and whether such cost could be added in full at one go or had to be spread over the quantity of pouches manufactured with the dies.
Analysis: The separate recovery of the cost of dies did not alter the position that the dies were developed by the appellant for manufacture of the printed pouches and that their value was part of the manufacturing cost relevant to valuation. The earlier decision in the appellant's own case was followed, and the principle of apportionment was affirmed. The reasoning accepted that the value of the dies could not be loaded entirely on the first clearance or on one lot, because the dies had to be valued with reference to their expected life and the quantity of pouches manufactured using them. The Board's clarification on spreading the cost of patterns over anticipated production was treated as supporting the same valuation approach.
Conclusion: The cost of the dies was includible in the assessable value, but only by proportionate spread over the expected production of pouches, not by adding the entire cost in one go. The matter was remanded for fresh quantification and determination.
Final Conclusion: The appellant obtained relief on the method of valuation, with the matter sent back for recalculation of the assessable value on an apportioned basis.
Ratio Decidendi: Where dies or similar tooling are separately recovered but are used over a series of manufactured goods, their value must be apportioned over the anticipated output for valuation purposes and cannot be loaded wholly on a single lot of clearances.