Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appellants granted Notification 93/76 benefit for split air conditioner after Collector's initial denial.</h1> <h3>TATA CONSULTING ENGINEERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., BANGALORE</h3> TATA CONSULTING ENGINEERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., BANGALORE - 2000 (124) E.L.T. 467 (Tribunal) The appeal was filed against the Collector (Appeals) order denying Notification 93/76 benefit for split air conditioner. The supplier mentioned Notification 56/78 in gate passes, but Collector acknowledged the correct Notification is 93/76. Appellants entitled to Notification 93/76 benefit. Impugned order set aside, appellants entitled to Notification 93/76 benefit.