Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Gentamycin Injection I.P. (Vet) was classifiable as a patent or proprietary medicament under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff, or as a non-branded medicament eligible for nil duty.
Analysis: The relevant tariff entry applied only where the medicine bore a name not specified in a pharmacopoeia, or a brand name, trade mark, symbol, monogram, label, signature, invented word, or other writing indicating a trade connection with a particular manufacturer or marketer. The product name was found to be the name of a medicine specified in the Indian Pharmacopoeia. The cattle-head symbol and label features were held to denote veterinary use and not a trade connection with the manufacturer or marketer. The distinction between a house mark and a product mark was applied, and the product was found not to carry any brand name or distinctive mark establishing such connection.
Conclusion: The goods were not patent or proprietary medicaments and were not classifiable under the higher-duty tariff entry.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the Revenue was set aside and the assessee succeeded on merits, with any refund remaining subject to the law of unjust enrichment.
Ratio Decidendi: A medicine specified in a pharmacopoeia does not become a patent or proprietary medicament unless its name or accompanying marks indicate a trade connection with a manufacturer or marketer; mere identification of veterinary use or a house mark is insufficient.