Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on material handling equipment, namely Wagon Trippler and Hydraulic Unloader, under Rule 57Q prior to its amendment.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the equipment qualified as capital goods eligible for Modvat credit before the amendment of Rule 57Q by Notification No. 11/95-C.E. (N.T.) dated 16-3-1995. The issue had already been concluded by prior Tribunal decisions, and on the facts presented no infirmity was found in the order allowing the credit.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the material handling equipment was held admissible, and the Revenue's challenge failed.