Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether mould development charges were includible in the assessable value of glass bottles where the moulds were not utilised for manufacture or no resultant product came into existence, and whether the matter required remand for proper verification.
Analysis: The liability to add mould or master die costs depends on their actual utilisation in the manufacture of the final product. The record showed the assessee's case that charges were included where bottles were manufactured, while no charges were raised or collected for rejected moulds on which no production resulted. The departmental authorities did not carry out a proper verification linking debit notes with resultant manufacture and instead rejected the claim mainly for want of further evidence. The Tribunal held that such linkage was necessary before confirming any demand, because charges relating to moulds on which no goods were manufactured could not be brought into the assessable value.
Conclusion: The demand could not be sustained without proper verification, and the matter was required to be remanded to the original authority for de novo consideration.
Ratio Decidendi: Mould development or master die charges are includible in assessable value only to the extent they relate to moulds actually utilised for manufacture of the final excisable goods; charges for unutilised moulds or rejected work cannot be added without factual verification linking them to resultant production.