Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether spares of air-conditioning systems installed in the factory were capital goods under Rule 57Q and whether the duty paid thereon was admissible as credit.
Analysis: The scope of capital goods under clause (a) of the Explanation to Rule 57Q(1) was applied broadly in light of the principle that goods need not be directly used in the manufacturing process if they are necessary for that process to take place. The air-conditioning system was treated as required to maintain temperature and humidity necessary for spinning cotton yarn, and there was no material to show that the machinery was not used in the factory's manufacturing operations.
Conclusion: The spares of the air-conditioning system were capital goods and the duty paid on them was admissible as credit.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods that are functionally necessary for the manufacturing process, though not directly used in production, qualify as capital goods for credit purposes when their use in the factory's manufacture is established.