Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether fans and blowers, liquid/air filters, air driers, grills of iron or steel or aluminium, air-tight doors, aluminium sheet metal trays and cooling towers were excluded from the benefit of Notification No. 175/86-C.E.; (ii) Whether heat exchangers, electrical storage water heaters and centrifuge machines were not parts or accessories of refrigerating or air-conditioning machines and appliances and therefore remained eligible for the exemption.
Issue (i): Whether fans and blowers, liquid/air filters, air driers, grills of iron or steel or aluminium, air-tight doors, aluminium sheet metal trays and cooling towers were excluded from the benefit of Notification No. 175/86-C.E.
Analysis: The exclusion clause in paragraph 4(iv) of the Notification removes refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery, and parts and accessories thereof, from the exemption. Goods which are used in air-conditioning systems as integral parts or accessories do not cease to fall within the exclusion merely because they may have some incidental or alternative use. On the facts, fans and blowers performed air circulation, filters removed airborne dust, air-tight doors were used in plant rooms, and cooling towers were used for water cooling in larger conditioning units. These items were treated as used in or accessory to air-conditioning machinery.
Conclusion: These goods were held to be excluded from the scope of Notification No. 175/86-C.E., and the exemption was denied in respect of them.
Issue (ii): Whether heat exchangers, electrical storage water heaters and centrifuge machines were not parts or accessories of refrigerating or air-conditioning machines and appliances and therefore remained eligible for the exemption.
Analysis: The lower authorities did not establish by evidence that electrical storage water heaters and centrifuge machines were parts or accessories of refrigerating or air-conditioning machinery. The record showed that these items had independent industrial uses. As to heat exchangers, the evidence indicated multiple applications and the Revenue did not rebut the specific material showing that the products manufactured by the assessee were not designed for air-conditioning or refrigeration use. The governing approach was that such goods fall within the excluded category only when they are designed and manufactured for use in refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery.
Conclusion: These goods were held not to be parts or accessories of refrigerating or air-conditioning machines and appliances, and the exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was available to them.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were disposed of by sustaining the denial of exemption for the products found to be air-conditioning accessories and by extending exemption to the products for which such nexus was not proved.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods are excluded from a fiscal exemption for refrigerating or air-conditioning machinery only when the evidence shows that they are designed for, or are parts/accessories of, such machinery; where independent industrial use is shown and no rebuttal evidence is produced, the exemption cannot be denied.