Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods manufactured by the assessee were correctly classifiable as photographic plates under Heading 37.01, and whether the order-in-appeal rejecting that classification was liable to be set aside.
Analysis: The goods were found to be master plates used for printing aluminium labels and not exposed plates. The classification adopted by the adjudicating authority under Heading 37.01 was accepted as correct, and the contrary reference in the appellate order was treated as a typing mistake.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Heading 37.01, the order-in-appeal was set aside, and the order-in-original was restored, resulting in success for the Revenue.