Titanium dioxide classification as raw material, not pigment, sustained advance licence benefit under import policy rules.

Titanium Dioxide (Rutile) Grade imported in unmixed, non-surface-treated form was treated as an inorganic chemical classifiable under Heading 28.23, not as pigment under Heading 32.06. On that basis, it was regarded as raw material rather than a sensitive-list pigment, so the advance licence benefit and Notification No. 203/92 were not denied. The classification clarification from the licensing authority, supported by technical material accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals), was sufficient to sustain the import benefit and the departmental challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether Titanium Dioxide (Rutile) Grade was to be treated as a pigment falling within the sensitive list so as to deny the benefit of the advance licence and Notification No. 203/92.

Analysis: The appeal turned on whether the imported goods were pigment in themselves or an inorganic chemical used as an input. The record showed that Titanium Dioxide, when unmixed and not surface-treated, was classifiable under Heading 28.23, while only mixed or surface-treated material would fall under Heading 32.06. On that basis, the goods imported were treated as raw material and not as pigment as such. The classification clarification of the licensing authority and the supporting technical material accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals) were found sufficient to sustain the grant of licence benefit.

Conclusion: The goods were not to be denied the benefit of the advance licence on the footing that they were pigment, and the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The departmental appeal failed and the order granting the import benefit was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Where titanium dioxide is imported in an unmixed and non-surface-treated form classifiable as an inorganic chemical, it is to be treated as raw material and not as pigment for denying licence benefits.

---