Appeals Dismissed for Defective Authorization under Central Excise Act - Procedural Requirements Not Met

The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed appeals by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Surat-II due to defective authorization not signed by the Commissioner as required by section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite multiple notices, the appeals were dismissed for not meeting procedural requirements. The Tribunal considered the absence of proper authorization a serious defect, resulting in dismissal under Rule 11 of CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982.

---

---

The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Surat-II due to defective authorization not signed by the Commissioner, as required under section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeals were dismissed for not complying with procedural requirements despite multiple notices. The Tribunal found the absence of proper authorization to be a serious defect, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed under Rule 11 of CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982.

---