1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeals Dismissed for Defective Authorization under Central Excise Act - Procedural Requirements Not Met</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed appeals by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Surat-II due to defective authorization not ... Appeal by department - Deficiencies The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Surat-II due to defective authorization not signed by the Commissioner, as required under section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeals were dismissed for not complying with procedural requirements despite multiple notices. The Tribunal found the absence of proper authorization to be a serious defect, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed under Rule 11 of CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
