Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of unutilized Modvat credit on inputs used in export goods was admissible when the refund claim was filed after the credit had lapsed under Rule 57F(17) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The claim arose from accumulated Modvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of goods exported before 1-3-1997. The credit lying unutilized on the first day of March 1997 stood lapsed under Rule 57F(17), and the refund application itself was filed only on 11-7-1997. The Tribunal held that the Board clarification and the earlier Tribunal order relied on by the assessee were confined to cases where the refund claim had already been filed before the lapsing date. It further held that, although Rule 57F(13) permits refund of credit where adjustment is not possible, such refund is available only if the credit is subsisting on the date of the refund claim. Since no credit remained available on the date of filing, the statutory conditions for refund were not satisfied.
Conclusion: Refund was not admissible and the assessee's contention was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where Modvat credit has lapsed under the governing rule before the refund application is filed, refund of such credit cannot be granted merely because the exported goods were manufactured from inputs on which credit had earlier accrued.