Strict compliance with exemption conditions defeats duty relief where the required declaration is filed late.

Entitlement to exemption under the notification depended on strict compliance with its prescribed conditions, including filing the declaration within the stipulated time. The Tribunal found that the appellant had not satisfied that requirement and there was no sufficient basis to disturb the lower authorities' finding on that lapse. As the condition precedent for exemption was not met, the claim to retain the duty benefit failed and the duty demand was not shown to be unsustainable. The issue was decided against the appellant and the demand confirmed by the lower authorities was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption from duty under the earlier notification or whether the demand was sustainable for non-compliance with the conditions attached to the exemption.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the operative notification and the fulfillment of its conditions. The Tribunal held that the appellant did not satisfy the requirement of giving the declaration within the stipulated time for availing the exemption, and there was no sufficient basis to disturb the lower authorities' finding on that lapse. On that footing, the appellant could not retain the benefit claimed and the duty demand was not shown to be unsustainable.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the appellant and in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the demand confirmed by the lower authorities was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Entitlement to exemption depends on strict compliance with the prescribed conditions, including timely declaration where required, and failure to satisfy those conditions defeats the claim for exemption.

---