TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waste and scrap arising from duty-paid glass bottles used as inputs attracted Rule 57F(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 so as to require duty payment and reversal of Modvat credit, and whether the extended period of limitation was invocable.
Analysis: The input bottles had been purchased on payment of duty and were used in the manufacture of aerated waters. The Tribunal held that the broken bottles and resulting waste and scrap arose during processing of inputs and were subsequently sold, bringing the case within the deeming provision of Rule 57F(5), under which such waste is treated as manufactured in the factory and can be removed only on payment of duty. The argument that Rule 57F(1)(ii) applied instead was rejected because the case did not involve removal of inputs for home consumption or export in the manner contemplated by that rule. The Tribunal also noted the failure to file the necessary classification list and held that the demand was sustainable, with no legal infirmity in invoking the proviso to Section 11A(1).
Conclusion: Rule 57F(5) applied, duty was payable on the waste and scrap, Modvat credit was liable to be reversed, and the extended period was validly invoked.
Ratio Decidendi: Waste arising from the processing of duty-paid inputs, when removed, is governed by the deeming fiction in Rule 57F(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and attracts duty payment and reversal of credit unless the case falls within the limited scope of Rule 57F(1)(ii).
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
