Prima facie case supports waiver of pre-deposit and stay where duty and penalty demands need fuller appellate examination.

A party challenging duty and penalty demands may obtain waiver of pre-deposit where the record shows a strong prima facie case and the impugned order does not clearly identify the disputed non-compliances. The Tribunal noted that the penalty stemmed from alleged repair work without statutory records, while the duty issues concerned exports, Modvat credit, and a minor RT-12 related demand. It accepted that repair work may not amount to manufacture and found the export and Modvat objections required fuller examination at the final hearing. On that basis, it granted stay of recovery of the duties and penalties pending appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the duties and penalties demanded under the impugned order.

Analysis: The dispute arose from a penalty imposed for alleged repair work without statutory records, duty demand relating to exports, Modvat credit, and a small amount linked to RT-12 returns. The appellant contested the penalty on the ground that repair work does not amount to manufacture and that no duty liability could arise on that basis. The appellant also challenged the export-related demand and Modvat disallowance by referring to documents said to have been produced. The impugned order did not clearly identify which export claims or Modvat claims were found to be non-compliant. In these circumstances, the Tribunal found that the demands required examination at final hearing and that the appellant had shown a strong prima facie case.

Conclusion: The Tribunal held that the case was fit for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery, and granted stay of the duties and penalties during pendency of the appeal.

---