Classification dispute over absorbable sutures led to denial of full stay and direction for substantial pre-deposit.

In a classification dispute over unsterilized absorbable sutures, the Tribunal found on a prima facie view that the goods appeared to fall under Chapter 42 rather than Chapter 5. An earlier appellate order in the assessee's favour did not by itself warrant complete stay of duty recovery, and the plea of revenue neutrality was not treated as determinative of classification. The Tribunal therefore declined full stay and directed a substantial pre-deposit, while leaving any Modvat credit claim to be considered by the jurisdictional authority at the appropriate stage under Rule 57E of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to complete stay of duty recovery in the classification dispute and what pre-deposit, if any, should be ordered.

Analysis: The dispute centered on classification of unsterilized absorbable sutures between Chapter 5 and Chapter 42. On a prima facie view, the product appeared to fall within Chapter 42, and the existence of an earlier appellate order in favour of the assessee did not by itself justify full stay. The plea of revenue neutrality was held not to be determinative of classification. Considering the overall circumstances, the Tribunal directed a substantial pre-deposit and indicated that any claim for Modvat credit could be considered by the jurisdictional authority at the appropriate stage under Rule 57E of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Conclusion: Complete stay was declined and the assessee was required to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 30 lakhs for pursuing the appeal.

---