Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether agglomerated marble manufactured from crushed marble mixed with cement, resin and additives is classifiable under Heading 25.04 as marble or under Heading 68.07 as an article of stone.
Analysis: The manufacturing process showed that the product was not a natural mineral marble but a composite article made from marble chips or lumps with cement, resin, pigments and catalysts, poured into moulds, vacuum compacted, cured, and then cut into slabs and tiles. The product was therefore materially different from marble as a mineral product. Applying the earlier tribunal view on identical facts, the heading for marble could not cover such agglomerated marble, which was produced mainly from crushed marble and other binding materials and thus fell within the residual heading for articles of stone.
Conclusion: The product is classifiable under Heading 68.07 and not under Heading 25.04, against the assessee.