Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim was barred by limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and whether the date of the public notice could be treated as the relevant date for computing limitation.
Analysis: The appellants had reversed and paid the amount on 29-3-1995 and 25-5-1995, but the refund claim was filed only on 16-6-1997. The claim was therefore made beyond six months from the dates of payment. The contention that the date of the public notice should be treated as the relevant date was not accepted for the purpose of Section 11B.
Conclusion: The refund claim was time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the rejection of the claim was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A refund claim under Section 11B must be filed within the prescribed limitation period counted from the relevant date of payment, and a later public notice does not extend or reset that limitation.