Modvat declaration lapse treated as procedural, with credit allowed subject to verification and notice held within time.

Failure to file the Rule 57G declaration was treated as a procedural lapse and did not, by itself, bar Modvat credit where receipt and use of the inputs in manufacture could be verified; the credit claim remained subject to factual verification. The show cause notice was held to be within limitation because it was issued within six months of the taking of credit, with the relevant date taken as the date of utilisation of credit. The demand aspect was set aside and remanded for verification, while the penalty was left undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether failure to file the declaration under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules barred availment of Modvat credit, and (ii) whether the show cause notice was barred by limitation.

Issue (i): Whether failure to file the declaration under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules barred availment of Modvat credit.

Analysis: The record showed that the inputs had been declared for Modvat purposes, the credit had been taken in the statutory records, and the declaration relating to the final product was filed later. The omission was treated as an inadvertent breach. The governing view applied was that where receipt and use of inputs in the manufacture of the final product can be verified, failure to file the declaration is only a procedural lapse and does not by itself defeat the credit.

Conclusion: The omission under Rule 57G did not, by itself, bar Modvat credit, subject to verification that the inputs were actually used in the manufacture of the final product.

Issue (ii): Whether the show cause notice was barred by limitation.

Analysis: The notice was issued within six months of the taking of credit, and the relevant date for limitation was taken to be the date of utilisation of credit. On that basis, the demand was held to be within time.

Conclusion: The show cause notice was not time-barred.

Final Conclusion: The demand aspect was set aside and sent back for factual verification, while the penalty was left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Non-filing of a Modvat declaration is a procedural lapse that does not defeat credit where actual receipt and use of the inputs in the manufacture of the final product are verifiable.

---