Electric coil stove classification turns on hot plate analogy; conflicting Bench views justified Larger Bench reference.

An electric coil stove was considered functionally akin to a hot plate for classification under Notification No. 160/86-C.E., rather than a distinct domestic electrical appliance falling in the residuary entry. Because a coordinate Bench had earlier taken a contrary view on the same classification issue, the matter was not finally resolved on merits and was referred to the President for constitution of a Larger Bench. The operative point is that conflicting Bench views on a classification question justify reference for authoritative determination.

---

---

Issues: Whether the product known as an electric coil stove fell under S. No. 5(a)(x) or S. No. 5(d) of Notification No. 160/86-C.E. dated 1-3-1986, and whether the matter should be referred to a Larger Bench because of a contrary coordinate Bench view.

Analysis: The product was treated as functionally akin to a hot plate, and not as a distinct domestic electrical appliance falling within the residuary entry. The order also noted that a previous coordinate Bench had taken a contrary view on the same question, creating the need for authoritative determination by a Larger Bench.

Conclusion: The issue was not finally decided on merits and was referred to the Honourable President for constitution of a Larger Bench.

Final Conclusion: The appeal did not result in a final ruling on the classification dispute and was sent for consideration by a Larger Bench.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a coordinate Bench has taken a contrary view on the same classification question, reference to a Larger Bench is appropriate for authoritative resolution.

---