Revenue-neutral excise duty and Modvat credit defeated separate duty demand on intermediate bleached fabric in textile processing.

Separate excise duty at the bleaching stage was not warranted where the fabric was subsequently dyed and duty was payable only at clearance in the processing chain. The Tribunal also accepted that Modvat credit would be available on duty paid on the intermediate bleached fabric under the relevant textile notification, which made the duty exercise revenue neutral. On that basis, the demand for separate duty at each processing stage was not sustainable, and the assessee's challenge succeeded with consequential relief.

---

---

Issues: Whether duty could be demanded separately at the bleaching stage in respect of fabrics subsequently dyed, and whether the appellants were entitled to Modvat credit so that the exercise was revenue neutral.

Analysis: The appellants disputed the factual premise that bleaching was done before dyeing and had invited departmental verification, which was not undertaken. The Tribunal held that, in the circumstances of this case, duty was payable at the time of clearance and not at each stage of processing. The Tribunal also accepted that the appellants would be entitled to Modvat credit of the duty paid on the bleached fabric under the notification extending that facility to textile products, making the exercise revenue neutral.

Conclusion: Separate duty at the bleaching stage was not sustainable and the Modvat credit position supported the assessee's case.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the processing chain results in duty being chargeable at clearance and Modvat credit is available on the intermediate product, separate excise duty at each processing stage is not warranted and the demand fails if the transaction is revenue neutral.

---