Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product manufactured by the assessee was marketable and therefore excisable to central excise duty.
Analysis: The product was stated to be used captively and to have a shelf-life of not more than 48 hours. The Revenue did not produce evidence to establish that the product was marketable as compounded rubber, and the adjudicating authority had not addressed this aspect with reference to the evidence. Marketability is a condition precedent for levy of duty on excisable goods, and the burden to prove marketability lies on the Revenue.
Conclusion: The product was held not liable to duty, and the assessee's appeal was allowed with consequential relief.