TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal grants Modvat credit in favor of applicant after dispute over goods classification</h1> <h3>STEELAGE INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & CUS., VADODARA</h3> STEELAGE INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & CUS., VADODARA - 2000 (118) E.L.T. 778 (Tribunal) Issues:1. Appeal against impugned order for disallowed Modvat credit.2. Dispute over classification of received goods as sheets or plates.3. Prima facie case for unconditional stay application.Analysis:1. The appeal challenges the disallowance of Modvat credit amounting to Rs. 46,421.12 by the respondents. The applicant received goods described as plates but claimed they were sheets eligible for credit under the Deemed Credit Order. The Commissioner upheld the disallowance citing Tariff Act classifications. However, the applicant argued that the goods received were sheets, not plates, based on Notification No. 44/93-C.E. The Tribunal found in favor of the applicant, noting that the duty documents did not specify sheets or plates, and granted the appeal, allowing the Modvat credit.2. The dispute centered around whether the received goods were correctly classified as sheets or plates for Modvat credit eligibility. The Tribunal analyzed the definitions of plates and sheets under relevant notifications and trade practices. It was established that the goods fell under the definition of sheets, not plates, as per the applicable law. The Tribunal referred to previous case law supporting the applicant's position and concluded that the disallowance of Modvat credit based on nomenclature differences was unjustified. The Tribunal upheld the applicant's claim and set aside the Commissioner's decision.3. Regarding the stay application, the applicant sought unconditional dispensation from predeposit of the disallowed duty amount pending appeal disposal. The applicant argued a prima facie case based on the correct classification of goods as sheets. The Tribunal considered the applicant's arguments, including departmental clarifications and relevant case law, and found merit in the applicant's case. The Tribunal granted the stay application, waiving the pre-deposit requirement and staying the recovery of the duty amount. The decision was based on the applicant's prima facie case and the discrepancies in the classification of goods as sheets, not plates, supporting the grant of unconditional stay.
TaxTMI 