Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revenue could, for the first time in appeal, contend for classification of the product under a new tariff heading not proposed in the show cause notice or classification list.
Analysis: The issue turned on the settled principle that a department cannot travel beyond the basis of the show cause notice or the classification already proposed and approved. A fresh heading or sub-heading cannot be introduced for the first time before the Tribunal in the absence of prior notice to the assessee. If the department seeks a different classification, the proper course is to issue a fresh show cause notice setting out the re-classification grounds.
Conclusion: The revenue's attempt to urge a new classification under sub-heading 90.31 was not permissible and failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected, while leaving it open to the department to initiate fresh proceedings for re-classification by a proper notice.
Ratio Decidendi: A party cannot be required to meet a new tariff classification ground raised for the first time in appeal when it was not part of the show cause notice or the original classification dispute; re-classification must be pursued through a fresh notice.