Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether patta/patti were correctly classifiable under sub-heading 7208.00 of the Central Excise Tariff and not under sub-headings 7211.31 and 7211.39 as strips.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the goods were consistently known as patta/patti and that earlier decisions had already held such goods to be outside the scope of strips for tariff classification. It relied on its prior rulings that, in the absence of a definition of strip for the relevant period and in view of the accepted classification approach, patta/patti were to be treated as pieces roughly shaped by rolling or forging rather than as strips. The earlier view was also supported by precedent holding that the same goods fell under Heading 7208.00 and not under Heading 7211.00.
Conclusion: Patta/patti were held to be classifiable under sub-heading 7208.00 and not under sub-headings 7211.31 and 7211.39. The Revenue's appeals failed.