Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal, in view of the claimed exemption as handicraft goods and the objection based on limitation and suppression of facts.
Analysis: The requested relief turned on whether the manufactured metallic yarn could prima facie be treated as handicraft goods entitled to exemption under the relevant notification. The materials showed that the processes of cutting, slitting and winding were carried out with electrically operated machines, and that the goods did not prima facie display the visual appeal or artistic improvement required for handicraft classification. The challenge on limitation also did not assist the applicants at this stage, because the show cause notice and the adjudication order recorded allegations of suppression, misdeclaration and intent to evade duty, which required no final determination in the stay proceedings. The demand and penalty therefore could not be said to lack a prima facie basis.
Conclusion: The applicants were not entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit or unconditional stay. Partial relief was granted by directing a substantial pre-deposit, with stay of recovery of the balance amount on compliance.