Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a manufacturer could claim exemption under Notification No. 1/93 in respect of some products while choosing not to claim the exemption in respect of other products, and whether the non obstante clause in the notification barred such selective availment.
Analysis: The governing principle accepted was that exemption can be claimed product-wise, and a manufacturer is not required to either avail or forgo the notification in respect of all manufactured goods uniformly. The non obstante clause was construed as applying to a different situation, namely where an option is exercised during a financial year to avail exemption for part of the year and it for the remaining part. It was held that the clause did not prohibit a manufacturer from treating each specified good separately. On that construction, the specified goods were not required to be clubbed together for the purpose of the notification.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to avail the exemption for two products while not claiming it for the third product, and the denial of that benefit was unsustainable.