Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 179/77 for the period prior to 1-3-1986 when the goods received from a job worker had already suffered duty and the process undertaken at the assessee's premises was without the aid of power.
Analysis: The bonder received by the assessee was treated as duty-paid goods, and the further activity resulted in a new product known as Precision Bonding Machine. The decisive question was whether the manufacture of that new product at the assessee's premises involved use of power. The Revenue did not dispute that the relevant processes at the assessee's premises were carried out without the aid of power. The plea that the job worker had earlier used electricity was rejected because the job worker was an independent manufacturer and the goods had already left its premises on payment of duty. The exemption was therefore attracted. Reliance was also placed on prior Tribunal decisions taking the same view.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 179/77, and the Revenue's appeal failed.