Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible when defective final products returned by customers were remelted and used in the manufacture of fresh final products.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the returned defective goods could be treated as inputs for the subsequent manufacturing process. The Tribunal noted that later decisions following the earlier Alcobex line of authority had accepted admissibility of credit where the returned goods were actually subjected to a manufacturing process in the assessee's factory. It also distinguished contrary decisions relied upon by the Revenue on the footing that they either preceded the relevant line of authority or involved materially different facts, including cases where no manufacturing process was undertaken. The Board's circular was held not to override the settled judicial position.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible to the assessee on the returned defective final products, and the Revenue's appeals were rejected.