Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the fabricated items, namely cross arms, ground pipes, clamps for PCC poles, horizontal cross arms, LT/HT single top support and anchor rods, were excisable and dutiable.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the same assessee's case had already been decided against the Revenue and that the earlier decision had held these items to be not excisable and not dutiable. The Tribunal followed its prior orders and the supporting decisions relied upon in that case.
Conclusion: The fabricated items were held to be not excisable and not dutiable.
Final Conclusion: The assessee's appeals succeeded and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the manufactured items are covered by the Tribunal's earlier binding view in the assessee's own case, they are to be treated as not excisable and not dutiable.